Skip to content


Sarawak wikileaks story and the Malaysian media

So, whilst we were visiting Malaysia what could have been a major media story broke. Activist blog Sarawak Report, which campaigns on environmental issues in Malaysia’s Eastern states, published a wikileaks style dump of data showing supposed “land grabs” – places where the chief minister of the state, amongst others, took land or benefits from the sale/development of land – much of it primary rainforest – for themselves.

If you think of the UK where the Telegraph’s report on ministerial expenses exposed small-scale corruption – duck ponds, travel, houses and the like – this story should have been immense. This is (at least potentially) the systematic destruction of the rainforest for massive personal gain. If the story is libellous, then the campaign sould have been investigated and discredited in the media. At least, that’s what you’d expect.

Instead, the major Malaysian newspapers have been almost completely silent on the story, with the exception of a few luke-warm stories reporting Government investigations into Radio Free Sarawak, a radio station campaigning on the Sarawak Report “allegations” and challenging corruption in the region, championed by Gordon Brown’s sister in law, Clare Rewcastle Brown.

The only outlet to cover the story was (paywall) MalaysiaKini, an online publication with a history of taking on the controversial and a few of whose reporters have paid the price for it – detained under the always-to-be-feared ‘ISA’ – Internal Security Act – which bascially grants the power to the government to do whatever it wants to whoever it wants. Thankfully Malaysian bloggers are now actively covering the story and hopefully awareness will break and something will happen, but somehow I’m doubtful. The papers probably exist in a combination of fear of the ISA and pressure from their political overlords – many of the Malaysian newspapers either are owned by or have strong affiliations with Malaysian political parties. Ref, Wikipedia, which adds this:

The national media are largely controlled by the government and by political parties in the Barisan Nasional/National Front ruling coalition and the opposition has little access to the media. The print media are controlled by the Government through the requirement of obtaining annual publication licences under the Printing and Presses Act. In 2007, a government agency — the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission — issued a directive to all private television and radio stations to refrain from broadcasting speeches made by opposition leaders.

It’s not surprising, as Malaysia persistently does poorly in global press-freedoms surveys, but it is depressing. This is why when I tell people I come from Malaysia, and they say “oh, that’s a beautiful place,” I sigh and say something non-committal. It’s difficult to think of a place as beautiful when its rotten to the core.

Posted in Current affairs, Media & Marketing.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , .

  • Sumisha

    This doesn’t really surprise me. Actually, I would hope that most Malaysians know that our newspapers are hardly the “watchdogs” that they’re ideally meant to be. When I was interning at the Sunday Star, a story I pitched on 1Malaysia clinics was given the OK on condition that it didn’t criticise them too much – they were Najib’s idea after all. Journalists are frustrated and they mock the papers that they work for. The power ultimately lies with the editors though…who all work for UMNO/MCA. Now that they’re trying to reign in bloggers as well, mamak stalls may soon be the only place left for sharing real news.

  • http://www.division6.co.uk Armand

    Thanks Sumisha. I’m not surprised either, just depressed. Bloggers will fight….!

  • Pingback: Journalism for ethical business | division6

  • Pingback: Is Malaysia becoming a laughing stock in the eyes of the global press? Or a bad joke? | division6

  • Pingback: Citizens of the world | division6